LandedFees vs DutyDecoder (2026): Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Independent comparison of LandedFees and DutyDecoder for landed cost calculation. Covers the 8-lane US duty stack, per-line citations, bulk CSV, anonymous access, and free-tier limits.
Try the calculator
Run a real calculation for this lane in under a minute. Free, no card.
Open calculatorLandedFees vs DutyDecoder (2026)
TL;DR verdict. Pick LandedFees if you file US entries and need the full 8-lane Chapter 99 overlay stack (Section 122, 232, 232 pharma, 301, 301 forced-labor, 338 Canada, AD/CVD) with per-line primary-source citations. Pick DutyDecoder if your workflow is multi-country HS lookup and you already have a paid seat with them. Both cover MFN duty and VAT for major destinations. LandedFees is free forever with unlimited calculations, no signup required, anonymous PDF upload. DutyDecoder requires an account past a demo.
Side-by-side matrix
| Feature | LandedFees | DutyDecoder |
|---|---|---|
| MFN base duty | Yes | Yes |
| Section 122 reciprocal | Yes | Verify |
| Section 301 Lists 1 to 4A | Yes | Partial |
| Section 301 forced-labor overlay | Yes | Verify |
| Section 338 Canada | Yes | Verify |
| Section 232 pharma 100 percent | Yes | Verify |
| AD/CVD case lookup | Yes | Flag only |
| Per-line primary-source citations | Yes (USITC 9903.xx, 19 CFR, CBP CSMS, FR) | No |
| Compare-origin (3 to 6 side-by-side) | Yes | No |
| Bulk CSV upload | Yes, 500 SKUs, free | Paid tier |
| Anonymous PDF upload with AI extraction | Yes, 95 percent accuracy | Verify |
| Public share link (no signup for viewer) | Yes (/r/[token]) | No |
| Denied-party screening (OFAC, BIS, CBP CSL) | Yes | Verify |
| Embed widget | Yes, free with attribution | Verify |
| Free tier | Unlimited | Demo only |
"Verify" means we could not confirm at time of writing. Check the vendor site.
Worked example: China to US, HS 8518.30.20 headphones, 150,000 USD
Feed a 500-unit shipment of headphones, HS 8518.30.20, 150,000 USD FOB Shanghai, into both tools.
LandedFees output. Eight itemized layers, each with the exact HS or 9903.xx heading cited. Total lands at 217,197.12 USD. The Section 301 List 3 layer (37,500 USD) and Section 301 forced-labor Tier A (4,500 USD) are the two biggest deltas versus a naive calculator.
DutyDecoder output. MFN base plus visible Section 301 layer. Full forced-labor overlay under 9903.05.37 to 9903.06.14: verify at their site. If the Tier A layer is missing, you understate by 4,500 USD on this shipment.
When to pick each
Pick LandedFees when. You are the IOR of record. You file 7501s. Your CFO wants the number defended line by line. You need to compare 3 to 6 sourcing origins in one screen. You want to send a customer a link without logging them into anything. You have a bulk of 50+ SKUs to reprice under the new 2026 overlays.
Pick DutyDecoder when. You have an existing paid seat. Your workflow is HS classification lookup across many countries at once. You already have a broker who runs the Chapter 99 stack for you, and you just need a fast base MFN plus VAT.
Use both when. You want a second opinion. Run the same lane through LandedFees and DutyDecoder. If the numbers differ, the delta is almost always in the Chapter 99 stack. Chase the citation.
Free-tier reality check
LandedFees does not gate the calculator. Unlimited calculations, PDF export, share link, embed widget, all free. Signup only unlocks calculation history and saved lanes.
DutyDecoder gates past the demo. Bulk CSV, deeper integrations, and higher query volumes sit behind a paid tier.
Verdict
For US import compliance work in 2026, LandedFees is the free-tier choice with the fullest US duty coverage. For a paid multi-country HS lookup workflow, DutyDecoder remains a defensible choice. Try both on your top three lanes and compare the numbers.
Try LandedFees at landedfees.com/calculator.
Frequently asked questions
Is LandedFees or DutyDecoder better for US imports?
LandedFees for the full 8-lane US duty stack with per-line citations. DutyDecoder for multi-country HS lookup on non-US destinations.
Do both tools have a free tier?
LandedFees is free forever with no cap. DutyDecoder offers a demo, then requires an account.
Ready to calculate?
Get a real number for your shipment in under a minute.
Free, no card, full breakdown of duty, VAT, freight, and fees.
Related guides
Regulatory Explainers
How the Section 232 inclusions process actually works: from petition to HTSUS 9903.81 line
Federal Register 2025-15819 (adopted Aug 19 2025) codified the standing Section 232 inclusions process. Two paths: domestic industry can petition to ADD an HTSUS to 232 scope, and affected importers or foreign producers can petition for EXCLUSION. BIS runs two comment windows per year. This is the evergreen explainer on filing mechanics, decision criteria, first-year grant rate statistics from Aug 2025 to Aug 2026, and how the current Aug 27 comment window fits into the standing process.
Regulatory Explainers
25 days after Section 122 sunset: what actually changed on the entry summary
Section 122 sunset at 12:01 AM EDT July 24 2026 after its 150-day statutory window. The replacement regime is Section 301 forced-labor duty at 10 to 12.5 percent on roughly 80 country partners under HTSUS 9903.05 and 9903.06 headings. 25 days in, this retrospective covers the operational delta on entry filings, the stack behavior with Section 232, the USMCA carve-out mechanics, and worked before/after examples on China, UK, and Canada lanes.
Regulatory Explainers
USMCA Rules of Origin Explained (2026 Guide)
USMCA rules of origin determine whether goods qualify for zero-duty preference between US, Canada, and Mexico. Includes RVC math, tariff-shift rules, and steel/auto specifics.
Regulatory Explainers
LandedFees vs Zonos (2026): Free Calculator vs Paid Checkout Platform
Compare LandedFees and Zonos for landed cost calculation. Zonos wins on checkout SDK and DDP guarantee. LandedFees wins on free-forever calculator, per-line citations, and the 8-lane US duty stack.