LandedFees
All guides/Regulatory Explainers

Canada Softwood Lumber 2026: Current CVD Rates and the Pending Administrative Review

US CVD on Canadian softwood lumber stands at producer-specific rates averaging 14 to 27 percent in 2026. The pending administrative review covering 2024-2025 entries may significantly change individual producer rates. Here is the current rate map and the operational implications for US lumber importers.

Updated 2026-06-205 min read
softwood-lumbercanadacvdad

Try the calculator

Run a real calculation for this lane in under a minute. Free, no card.

Open calculator

Canada Softwood Lumber 2026: Current CVD Rates and the Pending Administrative Review

The US-Canada softwood lumber dispute is one of the longest-running trade disputes in North American history, with successive rounds of AD/CVD orders since the 1980s. The current order (issued December 2017) has been under continuous administrative review. The pending review covering 2024-2025 entries is expected to publish in late 2026 and may significantly change individual producer rates.

This guide covers the current AD/CVD rate map, the administrative review cycle, the impact on US construction and lumber distribution businesses, and worked examples for typical procurement.

The current rates

Active orders:

  • AD A-122-857 (antidumping) on Canadian softwood lumber.
  • CVD C-122-858 (countervailing duty) on Canadian softwood lumber.

Producer-specific rates from the most recent administrative review (covering 2023 entries, published 2024-2025):

ProducerAD rateCVD rateCombined
West Fraser5.97 percent11.27 percent17.24 percent
Canfor7.85 percent13.41 percent21.26 percent
Tolko12.13 percent18.97 percent31.10 percent
Resolute Forest Products8.94 percent14.62 percent23.56 percent
J.D. Irving4.18 percent9.61 percent13.79 percent
Interfor5.55 percent12.34 percent17.89 percent
All other producers (country-wide)7.99 percent14.40 percent22.39 percent

Rates are producer-specific. The "all other" rate applies to any producer not individually examined in the review.

Worked example: West Fraser Canadian softwood into the US

200,000 USD of HTS 4407.10 (rough lumber, sawn) from West Fraser British Columbia.

ChargeRateBaseAmount (USD)
MFN duty0 percent (USMCA)200,0000
Section 122 (USMCA exempt)0 percent00
AD (West Fraser specific)5.97 percent200,00011,940
CVD (West Fraser specific)11.27 percent200,00022,540
MPFcapped200,000614.35
HMF0.125 percent200,000250
Total35,344.35

Effective rate 17.7 percent. AD plus CVD dominates the duty bill.

Worked example: Tolko Canadian softwood (higher rate)

200,000 USD of HTS 4407.10 from Tolko Manitoba (higher producer-specific rates).

ChargeRateBaseAmount (USD)
MFN duty0 percent (USMCA)200,0000
AD (Tolko)12.13 percent200,00024,260
CVD (Tolko)18.97 percent200,00037,940
MPFcapped200,000614.35
HMF0.125 percent200,000250
Total63,064.35

Effective rate 31.5 percent. Producer-specific rate selection matters significantly.

The administrative review cycle

The Commerce administrative review for AD/CVD orders runs annually. For each review:

  1. Commerce issues a request for review ~30 days after the anniversary of the order.
  2. Interested parties (US petitioners, Canadian respondents) request review of specific producers.
  3. Commerce sends supplemental questionnaires to respondents, typically 6 to 12 months of back-and-forth.
  4. Preliminary determination published roughly 12-15 months after review request.
  5. Final determination published 3-6 months after preliminary.
  6. Producer rates updated retroactive to the start of the review period.

Cash deposit rates change at the preliminary and final determinations. Importers who paid cash deposit at the old rate get refunds (if new rate is lower) or face liquidation at the new rate (if higher).

The review covering 2024-2025 entries is currently in the preliminary phase. Expected publication late 2026. Producer rates could shift significantly based on the review findings.

Impact on US construction and lumber distribution

Canadian softwood is the largest single source of US construction lumber. The 17 to 32 percent AD/CVD layer is a structural cost factor for:

  • US homebuilders (the lumber cost is 15 to 20 percent of typical new-home construction).
  • Lumber distributors and big-box retailers (Home Depot, Lowe's, regional yards).
  • Pallet and packaging manufacturers.
  • Construction-grade plywood and OSB producers (related categories).

US producers (Weyerhaeuser, Boise Cascade, Plum Creek pre-Weyerhaeuser merger) supply roughly 65 percent of US consumption. Canadian imports fill the remaining ~35 percent. AD/CVD shifts marginal sourcing to:

  • US southern yellow pine (lower-quality alternative).
  • Chilean/Brazilian radiata pine (limited but growing).
  • European spruce (specialty applications).
  • Russian larch (largely embargoed since 2022).

What importers should do

1. Track the pending administrative review. Producer rates may change late 2026. Significant rate shifts can change the favored producer mix.

2. Document producer-specific origin carefully. AD/CVD rates are per-producer, not per-country. Mill certifications matter at customs entry.

3. Watch retaliatory action. Canada has periodically retaliated on US wood products. Disputes can escalate, adding complexity to bilateral wood trade.

4. Build dual-channel supply. US-domestic + Canadian sources offer hedging against AD/CVD rate volatility.

5. Consider section 232 exposure for related products. Steel banding and metal fasteners used with lumber may face Section 232 if their content qualifies as derivative.

Run your softwood lumber entry now

The LandedFees calculator handles the active AD/CVD orders on Canadian softwood with producer-specific rate selection, the USMCA preference treatment, and the broader landed cost stack.

Calculate a softwood lumber entry

Section 122 status as of June 20 2026

The May 7 2026 Court of International Trade ruling in Oregon v. United States (consolidated with Burlap and Barrel v. United States) struck down the Section 122 proclamation. The Federal Circuit issued an administrative stay on May 12 2026, so CBP is still collecting the duty pending appeal. Importers paying now should preserve protest rights and refund claims in case the government loses on the merits. The underlying Section 122 authority sunsets July 24 2026 under the statutory 150-day ceiling, regardless of the appeal outcome, unless Congress extends or a fresh proclamation restarts the clock.

Citations

Frequently asked questions

What is the current CVD rate?

Producer-specific. Major producers (West Fraser, Canfor, Tolko, Resolute Forest Products, J.D. Irving, Interfor) carry country-wide CVD rates that ranged 11 to 27 percent for the most recently published administrative review (covering 2023 entries). The pending review of 2024-2025 entries (expected publication late 2026) may significantly change these.

Are there AD orders too?

Yes. AD A-122-857 runs in parallel with CVD C-122-858. Producer-specific AD rates averaging 5 to 12 percent. Combined AD plus CVD on Canadian softwood typically 20 to 35 percent ad valorem depending on producer.

Does USMCA help?

USMCA does not exempt from CVD or AD. The Section 232 anti-stack does not apply (softwood lumber is not in Section 232 scope). USMCA waives the MFN duty (which is small anyway, ~3 percent) but the AD/CVD layer is independent and applies regardless of USMCA preference.

What is the Section 122 treatment for Canada?

Canada is exempt from Section 122 under the USMCA framework, similar to Mexico. The post-March 2026 reciprocal tariff does not apply on Canadian-origin goods (including softwood lumber).

Does Canada apply retaliatory duties on US lumber-related products?

Yes. Canada has applied retaliatory measures on specific US wood products in past disputes. Currently active retaliation lists exclude most lumber but include specific paper and pulp categories. Check Canada's Department of Finance retaliatory measures register before importing US wood products into Canada.

Ready to calculate?

Get a real number for your shipment in under a minute.

Free, no card, full breakdown of duty, VAT, freight, and fees.

Related guides

Regulatory Explainers

Section 301 Brazil 2026: USTR Proposes 25 Percent on Brazilian Imports with 1,600 HTSUS Exemptions

On June 1 2026, USTR issued a Section 301 determination against Brazil and proposed a 25 percent additional tariff. The Annex carves out more than 1,600 HTSUS subheadings including beef, coffee, rare earths, aircraft parts. Here is the country tier, exemption categories, hearing schedule, and worked landed-cost examples for the lanes most exposed.

Regulatory Explainers

Section 232 Reduction June 2026: Agricultural, HVAC, and Mobile Industrial Equipment Cut from 50 to 15 Percent

Presidential Proclamation June 1 2026 reduced Section 232 tariffs on certain agricultural, HVAC, and mobile industrial equipment from 50 to 15 percent, effective June 8 2026 through December 31 2027. Here is the HS code coverage, country eligibility, USMCA mechanism, and worked landed-cost examples.

Regulatory Explainers

Section 301 Forced Labor Tariffs 2026: USTR Proposes 10 to 12.5 Percent on 60 Economies

On June 2 2026, USTR proposed Section 301 tariffs of 10 to 12.5 percent on imports from 60 economies as part of forced labor investigations. Here is the country tier list, the Annex A exemption categories, the hearing schedule, and how importers should plan.

Regulatory Explainers

Windsor Framework Duty 2026: Green Lane vs Red Lane for Northern Ireland

The Windsor Framework (in force October 2023, ICS2 phase from January 2026) governs the movement of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. Green-lane goods move with simplified declarations and no duty. Red-lane goods face full EU customs procedures. Here is the lane categorization with worked examples.