LandedFees
All guides/Guides

Duplicate MPF, HMF, and Broker Fees: 5 Double-Charge Patterns to Catch on Every Entry

Fee duplication is the small-dollar-per-entry leakage pattern that adds up materially at portfolio scale. Five patterns account for most of it: MPF cap misses, MPF collected twice on consolidated entries, HMF on air freight, HMF on FTZ withdrawal against original admission, and broker administrative fees passed through as CBP fees. Here is how to detect each one.

Updated 2026-08-227 min read
mpfhmffeesaudit

Try the calculator

Run a real calculation for this lane in under a minute. Free, no card.

Open calculator

Duplicate MPF, HMF, and Broker Fees: 5 Double-Charge Patterns to Catch on Every Entry

Fee duplication is the small-dollar-per-entry leakage pattern that adds up materially at portfolio scale. A few hundred dollars per entry on typical patterns, occasionally into the low thousands. Individually small, but on portfolios of thousands of entries the annualized recoverable dollars are substantial.

Five patterns account for most of it. This guide walks through detection and recovery. The leakage engine surfaces every pattern automatically. Confirmed findings route to tasks for PSC or protest filing.

Pattern 1: MPF cap misses

Merchandise Processing Fee under 19 CFR 24.23 is 0.3464 percent of entered value, capped at 634.62 USD per entry for calendar year 2026 (the cap adjusts annually for inflation under the CBP User Fee Advance Notice).

The math: an entry at 183,247 USD entered value hits the cap exactly (0.3464 percent equals 634.62 USD). Any entry above 183,247 USD entered value should pay only the cap, not the percentage.

Automated broker systems cap MPF automatically. Manual entries and consolidated entries with multiple sub-invoices can miss the cap. Common failure modes:

  • Broker software configured to compute MPF per invoice on a consolidated entry rather than per entry, producing multiple MPF charges that each hit the cap.
  • Manual entry keyed with the percentage rate but not the cap check.
  • Corrected entry after PSC where the MPF was recomputed on the amended value without re-verifying the cap.

Detection: MPF amount on 7501 above 634.62 USD (or the applicable year's cap value).

Recovery: PSC before liquidation, protest after liquidation within 180 days.

Recoverable per finding: the delta between the actual MPF charged and the cap. On a 1,000,000 USD entry that missed the cap, the recoverable is 3,464 minus 634.62 = 2,829.38 USD.

Pattern 2: MPF collected twice on consolidated entries

A consolidated entry can carry multiple commercial invoices from the same shipper. MPF is a per-entry fee, not a per-invoice fee. Two invoices should produce one MPF charge, not two.

The failure mode is broker software that treats each invoice as a separate entry summary line for fee calculation purposes. The result: MPF at 0.3464 percent applied twice to the split values, or the cap applied twice to values above the cap threshold.

Detection: MPF charges that exceed the cap in aggregate across a single entry number, or MPF computation that appears as multiple line items on the 7501 rather than a single fee.

Recovery: PSC before liquidation, protest after liquidation within 180 days.

Recoverable per finding: the duplicate MPF amount, up to 634.62 USD per duplicate.

Pattern 3: HMF on air freight

Harbor Maintenance Fee under 19 CFR 24.24 is 0.125 percent of entered value on cargo transported by ocean, no cap. HMF does not apply to air, truck, or rail cargo.

The failure mode is broker software that computes HMF unconditionally when a bill of lading is present in the entry data, without checking the mode of transport. Air cargo with an air waybill mistakenly typed as a bill of lading triggers HMF.

Detection: HMF charge on an entry where the mode-of-transport code (column 20 on the 7501) is anything other than ocean-related (codes 10, 11, 12, or 13 for ocean; codes 40, 41 for air; codes 20, 21 for truck; codes 60, 61 for rail).

Recovery: PSC before liquidation, protest after liquidation within 180 days.

Recoverable per finding: full HMF charge, typically 62.50 USD per 50,000 USD entered value, so a 1,000,000 USD air entry with HMF wrongly applied recovers 1,250 USD.

Pattern 4: HMF on FTZ withdrawal against original admission

Foreign Trade Zone admission under 19 CFR 146 requires HMF on the CBP-supervised admission to the zone. Subsequent withdrawal for consumption should not pay HMF a second time if HMF was already paid on original admission.

The rule under 19 CFR 24.24(e)(4)(iii) is that HMF is a one-time fee tied to the port-related use of the harbor infrastructure. Once paid on admission (or on original ocean import prior to zone admission), it is not owed again on withdrawal.

The failure mode is broker software that computes HMF on the withdrawal entry summary without cross-checking the FTZ admission fee record. This is a recurring pattern for zone operators using automated withdrawal filing.

Detection: HMF charge on an entry with Type 06 (FTZ withdrawal) or Type 08 (FTZ warehouse withdrawal) where the original zone admission also carried HMF.

Recovery: PSC before liquidation, protest after liquidation within 180 days.

Recoverable per finding: full HMF charge on the withdrawal.

Pattern 5: Broker administrative fees passed through as CBP fees

Some broker software configurations aggregate the broker's own administrative fees (single entry bond fee, ISF filing fee, dispatch fee, storage fee) into the CBP fee line on the 7501. The importer sees a single "fees" charge and assumes it is all CBP-owed.

Legitimate CBP fees on a 7501 are limited to: MPF, HMF, cotton fee (19 CFR 24.24(g) for cotton imports), sugar fee (for certain sugar imports), beef and dairy assessments, and a small handful of commodity-specific user fees. Anything else is either a broker administrative charge (not paid to CBP) or a CBP penalty (which shows in a different field).

Detection: fee line amounts on the 7501 that do not match a legitimate CBP fee schedule. The audit engine cross-references every fee amount against the CBP fee table and flags mismatches.

Recovery: this is not a PSC or protest issue with CBP; the recovery is a billing dispute with the broker. The importer requests the broker to issue a corrected invoice separating broker administrative fees from CBP fees, and the broker refunds any overpayment.

Recoverable per finding: variable, depends on broker fee structure. On a portfolio with a consistent pattern, this can be a large annualized number.

The 60-second per-entry fee audit

For a single entry, the fee audit runs approximately:

  • 15 seconds: check MPF against cap for entries above 183,247 USD entered value.
  • 15 seconds: check HMF applicability against mode-of-transport code.
  • 15 seconds: check for duplicate MPF on consolidated entries.
  • 15 seconds: check for HMF on FTZ withdrawal against original admission.

At portfolio scale, the audit is fully automated in the leakage engine. For a broker filing 200 entries a week, running the fee audit on every entry catches most of the recoverable dollars in bulk.

The CBP fee schedule for 2026

Legitimate CBP user fees on entries filed in calendar year 2026:

FeeRateCapApplicability
MPF0.3464%634.62 USD per entryFormal entries and Type 11 above 2500 USD
MPF minimum32.71 USDFormal entries with computed MPF below the minimum
HMF0.125%No capOcean cargo only
Cotton feeVariesCotton and cotton products, per 19 CFR 24.24(g)
Sugar feeVariesCertain sugar imports
Manual surcharge3.33 USDManual entries where automated would have worked

Any fee line on a 7501 that does not match one of these should trigger a "broker administrative fee misclassified as CBP fee" flag.

Recoverable dollars at portfolio scale

For a mid-market importer with 200 entries a month over 12 months (2,400 entries):

  • Pattern 1 MPF cap misses affecting 5 percent of high-value entries: 120 entries at average 1,500 USD recoverable each = 180,000 USD.
  • Pattern 2 MPF duplicates affecting 2 percent of consolidated entries: 48 entries at average 400 USD each = 19,200 USD.
  • Pattern 3 HMF on air freight affecting 1 percent of air entries: 24 entries at average 200 USD each = 4,800 USD.
  • Pattern 4 HMF on FTZ withdrawal affecting all withdrawals if pattern is present: highly variable.
  • Pattern 5 broker admin fee misclassification: variable, potentially large depending on broker.

Total on a routine audit: 200,000 to 500,000 USD annually. Individually small findings, but the recovery velocity is high because fee corrections liquidate at zero incremental duty impact and CBP acceptance rates on fee-correction PSCs are very high (near 100 percent when documentation is clean).

Run fee audit on your entry portfolio

The leakage engine surfaces every fee pattern in a single scan. Confirmed findings route to tasks for PSC or protest filing. Full audit trail preserved.

Start at landedfees.com/audit.

Citations

Frequently asked questions

What is MPF?

Merchandise Processing Fee under 19 CFR 24.23 is 0.3464 percent of entered value, capped at 634.62 USD per entry for 2026 (the cap adjusts annually for inflation). MPF applies to formal entries and to Type 11 informal entries above 2500 USD. Automated broker systems compute MPF automatically but manual and consolidated entries can miss the cap.

What is HMF?

Harbor Maintenance Fee under 19 CFR 24.24 is 0.125 percent of entered value on cargo transported by ocean, no cap. HMF does not apply to air, truck, or rail cargo. HMF applies to CBP-supervised admission to FTZ but not to subsequent withdrawal for consumption if HMF was already paid on original admission.

How large is fee duplication per entry?

A few hundred dollars per entry on typical patterns, occasionally into the low thousands on high-value entries where MPF cap misses land. Individually small, but on portfolios of thousands of entries the annualized recoverable dollars are substantial. The LandedFees leakage engine surfaces every pattern in one scan.

How do I recover duplicate fees?

Post Summary Correction under 19 CFR 141.114 before liquidation and within 314 days of entry. After liquidation, 19 USC 1514 protest within 180 days. Fee corrections liquidate at zero incremental duty impact; the recovery is straightforward once the pattern is documented.

Does the LandedFees engine catch broker administrative fees passed through as CBP fees?

Yes. The engine cross-checks each fee line on the 7501 against the CBP fee schedule and flags any fee amount that does not match a legitimate CBP fee (MPF, HMF, cotton fee, sugar fee, beef fee, dairy fee, etc). Broker administrative fees masquerading as CBP fees are a common pattern in some broker software configurations.

Ready to calculate?

Get a real number for your shipment in under a minute.

Free, no card, full breakdown of duty, VAT, freight, and fees.

Related guides

Undervaluation Red Flags: Benchmark Invoices Against FRED PPI Before CBP Does

CBP valuation enforcement runs on statistical anomaly detection at scale. If your invoice unit price is more than one standard deviation below the industry Producer Price Index benchmark, an Automated Targeting System flag is likely. Here is how the LandedFees engine benchmarks invoice values against FRED PPI series and factory-quoted comparables so importers see the flag before CBP does.

Section 338 Canada T-Minus 8: 19 CFR 146.3 Port Director Escalation Timeline and the 30-45 Day Response Math

Section 338 duties on covered Canadian-origin imports take effect August 19 2026 at 12:01 AM EDT. Eight days out and CBP has still not published a CSMS message, which means FTZ operators are working from the July 20 2026 Presidential Proclamations 11061, 11062, and 11063 plus their Annex II subheading lists as the only authoritative source. Operators asking for CSMS before coding Form 214 admission under Privileged Foreign are creating a filing bottleneck that only a written port director determination under 19 CFR 146.3 can resolve. This walkthrough covers the 30 to 45 day CBP response norm on 146.3 requests, the pre-cliff vs post-cliff filing math, why documented escalation still protects the Post Summary Correction and 19 USC 1520(d) refund pathway even when the letter lands after August 19, and the concrete duty numbers on a 500k CIF Ontario furniture entry where the difference between running the 146.3 request and accepting the operator's verbal is 250k in avoidable duty.

Textile Substantial Transformation Under 19 CFR 102.21 vs 134.35: Which Rule Controls Section 301 Forced-Labor Tier Assignment

Post-July 24 2026 Section 301 forced-labor tier assignment for Chinese-origin textile and apparel content is not controlled by the default substantial transformation rule at 19 CFR 134.35. It is controlled by the textile-specific rules of origin at 19 CFR 102.21, which apply a distinct hierarchy that in most cases fixes country of origin at the location where the fabric was knit or woven, not where the garment was cut and sewn. This walkthrough covers the 19 CFR 102.21(c)(1) through (c)(5) hierarchy, the fabric-formation test, why Vietnam and India-origin garments with Chinese yarn or fabric inputs typically flip to Chinese origin for Section 301 forced-labor tier purposes, the BOM and tariff-shift documentation CBP is requesting for Tier B claims, and how tier-2 supplier origin declarations become load-bearing when the mill invoice trail is thin.

Section 338 Canada T-Minus 12: FTZ Privileged Foreign Election Deadline and In-Transit Rule Absence

Section 338 tariffs on covered Canadian-origin imports go live August 19 2026 at 12:01 AM EDT under Presidential Proclamations 11061, 11062, and 11063. Unlike Section 122 which included an in-transit exception for goods on water before the effective date, the three July 20 2026 Section 338 proclamations contain no in-transit rule. This is a hard cliff: liquidation snaps to date of entry per 19 CFR 141.68 regardless of when the goods left Canada. The only pre-effective planning lever is a Foreign Trade Zone Privileged Foreign election filed before the August 19 cutoff, which locks the pre-S338 duty status and preserves the option to withdraw the goods later at the pre-S338 rate. This walkthrough covers the FTZ Privileged Foreign mechanic under 19 USC 81c(a), the CBP Form 214 filing procedure, the interaction with USMCA which does not waive Section 338, and the T-12 through T-0 operational checklist for importers holding Canadian goods in bonded warehouse or FTZ.