N322920

N322920 December 16, 2021 CLA-2-18:OT:RR:NC:N2:N232 CATEGORY: Classification; Country of Origin, Trade Programs TARIFF NO.: 1806.20.8100; 1806.20.8300; 9823.08.01 Mr. Graeme Honeyfield Glinso Foods LLC 3800 SW Cedar Hills Blvd Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: The Classification, Country of Origin Marking and Eligibility of the United States- Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement (USMCA) for an Anhydrous Milkfat and Cocoa Liquor Blend. (“CDP 99:1 Blend”) Dear Mr. Honeyfield: This is in response to your letter dated November 16, 2021, requesting a ruling on the classification, country of origin marking and eligibility of the USMCA on an Anhydrous Milkfat and Cocoa Liquor Blend. The subject merchandise is an Anhydrous Milkfat and Cocoa Liquor Blend (“CDP 99:1 Blend”) which is described as a dry blend of 99 percent anhydrous milkfat and 1 percent cocoa liquor. The anhydrous milkfat in the blend is produced in New Zealand from New Zealand cow’s milk. The cocoa liquor is produced in the United States from cocoa beans imported from a non-USMCA country. The ingredients are processed, blended and packed in Mexico. The CDP 99:1 Blend will be packed into 1200-1500 kilograms plastic barrier bulk totes flushed with nitrogen. The finished product will be used to make chocolate products. Classification: The applicable subheading for the CDP 99:1 Blend will be 1806.20.8100, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Chocolate and other food preparations containing cocoa: Other preparations in blocks or slabs weighing more than 2 kg or in liquid, paste, powder, granular or other bulk form in containers or immediate packings, of a content exceeding 2 kg: Other: Other: Other: Dairy products described in additional U.S. note 1 to chapter 4: Described in additional U.S. note 10 to chapter 4 and entered pursuant to its provisions. The general rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem. If the quantitative limits of additional U.S. note 10 to chapter 4 have been reached, the product will be classified in subheading 1806.20.8300, HTSUS, and dutiable at the rate of 52.8 cents per kilogram plus 8.5 percent ad valorem. In addition, products classified in subheading 1806.20.8300, HTSUS, will be subject to additional duties based on their value, as described in subheadings 9904.04.50 to 9904.05.01, HTSUS. Country of Origin The marking statute, Section 304(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1304(a)), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States the English name of the country of origin of the article. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. § 1304 was “that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the marking on imported goods the country of which the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking should influence his will.” United States v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 297, 302 (1940). Pursuant to section 102.0, interim regulations, related to the marking rules, tariff-rate quotas, and other USMCA provisions, published in the Federal Register on July 6, 2021 (86 FR 35566), the rules set forth in §§ 102.1 through 102.18 and 102.20 determine the country of origin for marking purposes with respect to goods imported from Canada and Mexico. Section 102.11 provides a required hierarchy for determining the country of origin of a good for marking purposes, with the exception of textile goods which are subject to the provisions of 19 C.F.R. § 102.21. Applied in sequential order, the required hierarchy establishes that: (a) The country of origin of a good is the country in which: (1) The good is wholly obtained or produced; (2) The good is produced exclusively from domestic materials; or (3) Each foreign material incorporated in that good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification set out in section 102.20 and satisfies any other applicable requirements of that section, and all other requirements of these rules are satisfied. Sections 102.11(a)(1) and 102.11(a)(2) do not apply to the facts presented in this case because the CDP 99:1 Blend is neither wholly obtained nor produced exclusively from “domestic” (Mexico, in this case) materials. Accordingly, we look to section 102.11(a)(3). The applicable tariff shift requirement in section 102.20 for the CDP 99:1 Blend of subheading 1806.20, HTSUS, consist of the following: A change to subheading 1806.20 from any other heading, except from Chapter 17; or A change to subheading 1806.20 from Chapter 17, provided that the good contains less than 65 percent by dry weight of sugar. Because the foreign material (anhydrous milkfat and cocoa liquor) contained in the CDP 99:1 Blend are classified in subheading 0405.60.20 and 1803.10.00, the tariff shift rule is met. Therefore, in accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 102.11(a)(3), the country of origin for marking purposes of the CDP 99:1 Blend is Mexico. USMCA: The USMCA was signed by the Governments of the United States, Mexico, and Canada on November 30, 2018. The USMCA was approved by the U.S. Congress with the enactment on January 29, 2020, of the USMCA Implementation Act, Pub. L. 116-113, 134 Stat. 11, 14 (19 U.S.C. § 4511(a)). General Note (“GN”) 11, HTSUS, implements the USMCA. GN 11(b) sets forth the criteria for determining whether a good is an originating good for purposes of the USMCA. GN 11(b) states, in relevant part: For the purposes of this note, a good imported into the customs territory of the United States from the territory of a USMCA country, as defined in subdivision (l) of this note, is eligible for the preferential tariff treatment provided for in the applicable subheading and quantitative limitations set forth in the tariff schedule as a “good originating in the territory of a USMCA country” only if— the good is a good wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or more USMCA countries; the good is a good produced entirely in the territory of one or more USMCA countries, exclusively from originating materials; the good is a good produced entirely in the territory of one or more USMCA countries using nonoriginating materials, if the good satisfies all applicable requirements set forth in this note (including the provisions of subdivision (o)); or … Since the CDP 99:1 Blend contains non-originating material, they are not considered goods wholly obtained or produced entirely in a USMCA country under GN 11(b)(i) and (ii). We must next determine whether the CDP 99:1 Blend under GN 11(b)(iii) applies. The CDP 99:1 Blend is classified in subheading 1806.20, HTSUS. The applicable rule of origin for merchandise under subheading 1806.20, HTSUS, is in GN 11(o), HTSUS, which provides, in relevant part: Chapter 18 (4) “A change to headings 1806.20 from any other heading.” The CDP 99:1 Blend contains anhydrous milkfat, which is non-originating from New Zealand, is classified in heading 0405, thus, the tariff shift rule is met. Accordingly, the CDP 99:1 Blend classified under subheading 1806.20.8100, HTSUS, is eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA. However, if the CDP 99:1 Blend is classified under subheading 1806.20.8300, HTSUS, we note that the special column for subheading 1806.20.8300, HTSUS, references subheadings 9823.08.01-9823.08.38, HTSUS. U.S. Note 8 to Subchapter XXII, which concerns other dairy products pursuant to the USMCA, provides that: This note and subheadings 9823.08.01 through 9823.08.38 are effective as to originating goods of the USMCA countries eligible for special tariff treatment under the terms of general note 11 to the tariff schedule provide