LandedFees
All guides/Regulatory Explainers

Incoterms 2020 vs Landed Cost: A Clear Guide

How the 11 Incoterms 2020 affect landed cost calculation, risk transfer, and who pays customs duty and freight.

Updated 2026-06-106 min read
incotermsfobcifddp

Try the calculator

Run a real calculation for this lane in under a minute. Free, no card.

Open calculator

Incoterms 2020 vs Landed Cost: A Clear Guide

Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) are the contractual rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce that allocate responsibilities between buyer and seller in an international goods transaction. The current edition is Incoterms 2020, in force since 1 January 2020. The eleven terms determine who arranges transport, who pays for it, who insures, where risk transfers, and who is responsible for customs clearance and duty.

For landed cost calculation the Incoterm matters because it sets the dutiable value (FOB, CIF, or other), determines who is the importer of record, and structures the cash-flow obligations. This guide walks through the 11 terms with their cost implications.

The 11 terms grouped

The 11 Incoterms 2020 fall into four groups:

Group E: departure

  • EXW (Ex Works): seller makes goods available at their premises. Buyer arranges everything, including export clearance.

Group F: main carriage unpaid

  • FCA (Free Carrier): seller delivers to a named carrier or place. Buyer pays main carriage.
  • FAS (Free Alongside Ship): seller delivers alongside the vessel at the port of loading. Sea/inland waterway only.
  • FOB (Free On Board): seller delivers when goods are on the vessel. Sea/inland waterway only.

Group C: main carriage paid

  • CFR (Cost and Freight): seller pays ocean freight to destination port; risk transfers at loading. Sea only.
  • CIF (Cost, Insurance and Freight): CFR plus minimum cargo insurance. Sea only.
  • CPT (Carriage Paid To): seller pays freight to named destination; risk transfers at first carrier. Any mode.
  • CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To): CPT plus cargo insurance. Any mode. In 2020 insurance scope is the higher Institute Cargo Clauses A.

Group D: arrival

  • DAP (Delivered At Place): seller delivers at named place, not unloaded. Any mode.
  • DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded): seller delivers at named place, unloaded. Any mode. Replaced DAT.
  • DDP (Delivered Duty Paid): seller delivers cleared for import, duty paid. Any mode.

Quick cost matrix

Who pays each cost item under each term:

StepEXWFCAFOBCIFDAPDDP
Export clearanceBuyerSellerSellerSellerSellerSeller
Inland transport to port (origin)BuyerSellerSellerSellerSellerSeller
Loading on vesselBuyerN/ASellerSellerSellerSeller
Ocean freightBuyerBuyerBuyerSellerSellerSeller
Marine insuranceBuyerBuyerBuyerSeller (min)BuyerBuyer
Unloading at destinationBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerSeller
Import clearanceBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerSeller
Duty + import VATBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerSeller
Inland transport to destinationBuyerBuyerBuyerBuyerSellerSeller

Risk transfer is not the same as cost transfer

A subtle point that catches many importers: risk transfers at a different point than cost responsibility under some terms.

  • CIF: cost runs to destination port (seller pays freight), but risk transfers when goods are loaded on the vessel at the origin port. If the ship sinks mid-Pacific with your goods, you (the buyer) bear the loss, not the seller.
  • CIP: same dynamic; risk transfers at first carrier.
  • CPT: same; risk transfers at first carrier.

The risk-cost gap is why CIF/CIP/CPT terms require thinking carefully about insurance coverage. The seller is obligated to procure minimum insurance under CIF; under CIP 2020 the seller must procure higher cover. Buyers may want to top up for full Institute Cargo Clauses A coverage if not already included.

Effect on the customs value

Different customs authorities use different default bases for customs value:

  • US: typically FOB-based (the import is appraised at the transaction value as defined by 19 USC 1401a, but in practice many adjustments are FOB-equivalent).
  • EU: CIF-based (cost, insurance, freight to the port of entry).
  • UK: CIF-based.
  • Canada: FOB-based (with adjustments).
  • Most other countries: CIF-based.

When the agreed Incoterm differs from the local customs basis, the customs broker must adjust. For example, a US import on CIF terms has the customs value adjusted down to FOB (freight and insurance subtracted) for US customs purposes; the freight and insurance are noted separately.

Worked example: a 100,000 USD shipment China to USA

Under each Incoterm, who pays what:

Assume: 100,000 USD product value FOB Shanghai, 4,000 USD ocean freight to Long Beach, 400 USD marine insurance, 800 USD origin terminal charges, 1,200 USD destination handling, 800 USD US trucking to LA warehouse.

EXW (Ex Shanghai)

Buyer cost line items:

  • Product: 100,000 (assumes EXW = same product price)
  • Origin trucking: ~500
  • Origin terminal charges: 800
  • Loading: 200
  • Ocean freight: 4,000
  • Marine insurance: 400
  • Destination handling: 1,200
  • US customs duty + 122 + 301 (say 47.5% total on FOB): 47,500
  • US broker: 250
  • US trucking: 800
  • Total landed: ~155,650

FOB (Shanghai)

Buyer cost line items:

  • Product FOB Shanghai (includes export clearance, origin transit, loading): 100,000
  • Ocean freight: 4,000
  • Marine insurance: 400
  • Destination handling: 1,200
  • US duty: 47,500
  • Broker, trucking: 1,050
  • Total landed: ~154,150 (small saving versus EXW because seller does origin work more cheaply)

CIF (Long Beach)

Seller cost line items (in 100,000 product value):

  • Product FOB + freight + insurance = product invoiced at CIF, say 104,500 USD on the commercial invoice.

Buyer cost line items:

  • Pay seller invoice: 104,500
  • Destination handling: 1,200
  • US duty on FOB: 47,500 (US customs deducts freight and insurance from CIF for duty purposes)
  • Broker, trucking: 1,050
  • Total landed: ~154,250

DDP (LA warehouse)

Seller cost line items: everything to LA warehouse, including duty and 122 and 301.

Buyer cost: just the DDP invoice from seller. Whatever number the seller quotes.

Under DDP the seller takes on the IOR role and faces the practical issue that they may not be set up to do that in the US.

DDP complications: the IOR question

DDP means the seller is the importer of record. In practice:

  • Seller has a US entity: simple. The US entity is IOR.
  • Seller does not have a US entity: the seller must arrange a US indirect representative or risk losing money on the duty calculation. Some shipping companies offer DDP-with-IOR services for a fee.

For complex shipments (high-value, controlled goods, subject to AD/CVD), DDP from non-resident sellers is impractical. DAP shifting to the buyer is the common alternative.

Choosing the right Incoterm

Decision factors:

  • Who has the best freight rates? If buyer has volume contracts, FOB/FCA preferred.
  • Who has the customs expertise? DDP shifts compliance burden to seller.
  • Cash flow timing: DDP means seller cash-flows the duty; under FOB the buyer cash-flows.
  • Risk preferences: buyers wanting maximum control choose FCA/FOB. Sellers wanting to remove logistics complexity choose DAP/DPU.
  • Insurance: CIF/CIP shifts insurance procurement to seller; buyer must verify the policy meets their needs.

How the calculator handles Incoterms

The LandedFees calculator lets you specify the Incoterm and automatically:

  1. Sets the customs value basis according to the destination country (FOB for US, CIF for EU/UK).
  2. Allocates freight and insurance to the correct party.
  3. Computes duty on the correct base.
  4. Estimates total landed cost regardless of who pays each step.

Run a landed cost calculation in the calculator.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Incoterms 2010 and 2020?

Incoterms 2020 replaced DAT (Delivered At Terminal) with DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded), expanded coverage of cargo insurance under CIF and CIP, and clarified obligations around security-related screening. Eleven terms in total, same total count as 2010.

Which Incoterm gives the buyer the lowest landed cost?

EXW (Ex Works) gives the buyer the lowest seller cost but the highest logistics complexity. DDP gives the buyer the highest seller cost but the lowest complexity. The landed cost is the same in principle; the question is who organizes and pays the steps.

Under FOB, who pays customs duty?

The buyer (importer of record). FOB shifts responsibility at the port of loading; the buyer arranges and pays for ocean freight, marine insurance, destination port charges, customs clearance, duty, and inland transport.

Under DDP, does the seller pay import VAT?

Yes. DDP means the seller delivers the goods, cleared for import, to the buyer's named destination. Seller pays duty, import VAT, and any other import-related charges. Practical issue: many sellers cannot be the importer of record in the buyer's country.

Are CIF and CIP the same?

No. CIF (Cost Insurance Freight) is for sea/inland waterway only and uses transfer at the ship's rail. CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid) is for any mode of transport and uses transfer when goods are handed to the first carrier.

Ready to calculate?

Get a real number for your shipment in under a minute.

Free, no card, full breakdown of duty, VAT, freight, and fees.

Related guides

Regulatory Explainers

USMCA Yarn-Forward Compliance for Cotton Apparel Reshoring from India Post-July-24: Tactical Implementation Depth

The July 24 2026 Section 301 forced-labor 12.5 percent layer on Indian-origin cotton apparel (Chapter 61 and 62) has re-opened the USMCA Mexican reshoring economics compared previously in the Jul 30 lane comparison. This is the tactical yarn-forward compliance walkthrough for importers considering the shift: how the rule of origin operates on cotton apparel, which yarn sources qualify, how the trim allowance interacts, and the certification chain of custody importers need to build before the first USMCA-preference entry lands.

Regulatory Explainers

Section 338 Canada T-19: CIT Litigation Posture 19 Days Before Aug 19 Effective

With 19 days until the Section 338 50 percent duty layer on covered Canadian-origin goods takes effect on August 19 2026, this is the CIT litigation posture update. No public filings yet against the July 20 proclamations. Analysis of the Section 301 supersession question, the ITC investigation predicate issue, USMCA-non-shield exposure, and the pre-effective window operational implications for importers who might be planning to hold entries pending an injunction that may not land in time.

Regulatory Explainers

Section 232 Pharma 100 Percent T-0 First Day: What Annex III Filings Look Like on July 31 2026

The Section 232 pharmaceutical proclamation of April 2 2026 hits its first effective date on July 31 2026 at 12:01 AM Eastern Time for the 17 companies listed in Annex III. Everyone else gets the same 100 percent rate on September 29 2026. This is the T-0 operational rundown for importers, brokers, and finance teams affected by day one.

Regulatory Explainers

Section 232 Pharma Country-Tier Substitution Economics: EU 15 Percent vs India 110 Percent Stack

The Section 232 pharma proclamation of April 2 2026 established a tiered rate structure that creates a large landed-cost gap between EU/Japan/Korea/Switzerland/Liechtenstein origin (15 percent) and unpreferred origins including India, China, and non-Annex-II jurisdictions (100 percent plus any Section 301 forced-labor overlay). This is the country-tier substitution economics walkthrough for pharma importers who need to model supplier restructuring on a 60-day compliance runway before September 29 general effective date.