Loading
Cookie preferences
We use cookies for essential functionality. With your consent, we also use analytics (Google, PostHog) and marketing pixels (Meta, LinkedIn) to improve LandedFees. You can withdraw consent anytime in Settings. Settings.
Tariff classification of CO2 cartridges; AFR/Protest No. 2704-23-164523
HQ H331516 June 21, 2023 OT:RR:CTF:EMAIN H331516 LCB CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 2811.21.00 Port Director 301 East Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, California 90802 Re: Tariff classification of CO2 cartridges; AFR/Protest No. 2704-23-164523 Dear Port Director: The following is our decision regarding the Application for Further Review (“AFR”) of Protest No. 2704-23-164523 filed on behalf of Crosman Corporation (“Protestant”). Protestant contests the tariff classification by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) of “Crosman Powerlet CO2 Cartridges” (hereinafter “CO2 cartridges”). The subject entry occurred on September 18, 2021, after having been liquidated under heading 2811, HTSUS, on September 13, 2021. In preparing this ruling, consideration was given to protestant’s AFR as well as our conference with protestant’s counsel, held on June 15, 2023, and protestant’s follow-up submission sent to our office June 16, 2023. FACTS: At issue in the present case is compressed carbon dioxide (“CO2”) gas in small steel cylinders, referred to by protestant as “cartridges.” Each cartridge consists of a main body and a neck containing a cap and seal. The welded neck is unthreaded. The subject CO2 cartridges are sold in quantities of twenty-five pieces and are labeled “Crosman Powerlet CO2 Cartridges.” The CO2 cartridges may be used in air guns. When the CO2 cartridge is inserted into an air gun, the seal is punctured to release the CO2, which is used to propel BBs or pellets. Once the CO2 is depleted, the steel cylinder is disposed of. The cartridges are not refillable and are not suitable for repetitive use. ISSUE: Whether the subject CO2 cartridges are classified under heading 2811, HTSUS, which provides for, “Other inorganic acids and other inorganic oxygen compounds of nonmetals,” under heading 7311, HTSUS, which provides for “Containers for compressed or liquefied gas, of iron or steel,” or under heading 9306, HTSUS, which provides for, in pertinent part, “cartridges and other ammunition and projectiles and parts thereof.” LAW AND ANALYSIS: Initially, we note that the matters protested are protestable under 19 U.S.C. §1514(a)(2) as decisions on classification. The protest was timely filed, within 180 days of liquidation of the entries at issue. (Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-429, § 2103(2)(B)(ii), (iii) (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. § 1514(c)(3) (2006)). Further Review of Protest No. 2704-23-164523 is properly accorded to protestant pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 174.24(c) because the decision against which the protest was filed involves matters previously ruled upon by CBP, but facts are alleged or legal arguments presented which were not considered at the time of the original ruling. Namely, the protestant acknowledges that CBP classified “Crosman Powerlet CO2 Cartridges” under heading 2811, HTSUS, in Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H320777, dated December 16, 2023, but in so doing did not address the scope of heading 9305, HTSUS. Classification under the HTSUS is determined in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (“GRIs”). GRI 1 provides that the classification of goods shall be determined according to the terms of the headings of the tariff schedule and any relative section or chapter notes. If the goods cannot be classified solely based on GRI 1, and if the headings and legal notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRIs 2 through 6 may then be applied in order. GRI 5 provides, in pertinent part, the following: (b) Subject to the provisions of rule 5(a) above, packing materials and packing containers entered with the goods therein shall be classified with the goods if they are of a kind normally used for packing such goods. However, this provision is not binding when such packing materials or packing containers are clearly suitable for repetitive use. In addition, in interpreting the HTSUS, the Explanatory Notes (“ENs”) of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System may be utilized. The ENs, although not dispositive or legally binding, provide a commentary on the scope of each heading, and are generally indicative of the proper interpretation of the HTSUS. See T.D. 89-80, 54 Fed. Reg. 35127 (August 23, 1989). The HTSUS provisions under consideration in this ruling are as follows: 2811 Other inorganic acids and other inorganic oxygen compounds of nonmetals: * * * 7311 Containers for compressed or liquefied gas, of iron or steel * * * 9306 Bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war and parts thereof; cartridges and other ammunition and projectiles and parts thereof, including shot and cartridgewads: The EN to heading 28.11 provides, in pertinent part, the following: This heading covers mineral acids and anhydrides and other oxides of non-metals. The most important are listed below according to their non-metal component (*): *** (L) CARBON COMPOUNDS (2) Carbon dioxide (CO2) … Carbon dioxide can be presented either as a liquid (compressed in steel cylinders), or as a solid (compressed cubes in insulated container, “carbonic snow” or “carbonic ice”) ... The EN to heading 73.11 provides, in pertinent part, the following: This heading covers containers of any capacity used for the transport or storage of compressed or liquefied gases (e.g., helium, oxygen, argon, hydrogen, acetylene, carbon dioxide or butane). The EN to heading 93.06 provides, in pertinent part, the following: This heading includes: Ammunition, e.g.: *** (2) Cartridges of all types: blank (including blank cartridges for riveting tools or for starting compression ignition internal combustion piston engines), bulleted, tracer, incendiary, armor piercing, ball and shot cartridges for sporting guns, etc. Note 2(a) to Chapter 28 of the HTSUS provides, inter alia, that certain compounds of carbon are classified under the chapter, including “oxides of carbon.” Carbon dioxide is one of several “oxides of carbon . . . (heading 2811),” and is therefore classifiable within Chapter 28, HTSUS. Additionally, the EN to heading 2811 specifically provides that “Carbon dioxide can be presented either as a liquid (compressed in steel cylinders) or as a solid (compressed cubes in insulated containers, “carbonic snow” or “carbonic ice”) (Emphasis added). Therefore, the subject CO2 cartridges, which contain pressurized carbon dioxide, are properly classified under heading 2811, HTSUS. Protestant argues that the CO2 cartridges are classified under heading 9306, HTSUS, which provides for “Bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war and parts thereof; cartridges and other ammunition and projectiles and parts thereof, including shot and cartridgewads.” We disagree. Exemplars of cartridges that fall within heading 9306 are listed in the EN as: Ammunition, e.g.: (2) Cartridges of all types: blank (including blank cartridges for riveting tools or for starting compression ignition internal combustion piston engines), bulleted, tracer, incendiary, armour piercing, ball and shot cartridges for sporting guns, etc. Because Item (A)(2) “Cartridges of all types” falls under the superior designation for “Ammunition” within the EN to heading 9306, HTSUS, it follows that the cartridges of heading 9306, HTSUS, are those used as ammunition. This conclusion comports with the relevant legal text of heading 9306, HTSUS, which provides for “cartridges and other ammunition and projectiles.” (Emphasis added). The CO2 cartridges at issue do not constitute rounds nor ammunition. They are merely cylinders that store energy in the form of compressed CO2. Consequently, a cylinder of compressed CO2 is not a cartridge or other ammunition of heading 9306, HTSUS, regardless of whether it is sized to fit into an air gun. In support of its claim that the CO2 cartridges should be classified under 9306, HTSUS, protestant cites New York Ruling Letter (“NY”) L84342 (April 28, 2005), and Headquarters Ruling Letter (“
Initially, we note that the matters protested are protestable under 19 U.S.C. §1514(a)(2) as decisions on classification. The protest was timely filed, within 180 days of liquidation of the entries at issue. (Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-429, § 2103(2)(B)(ii), (iii) (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. § 1514(c)(3) (2006)). Further Review of Protest No. 2704-23-164523 is properly accorded to protestant pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 174.24(c) because the decision against which the protest was filed involves matters previously ruled upon by CBP, but facts are alleged or legal arguments presented which were not considered at the time of the original ruling. Namely, the protestant acknowledges that CBP classified “Crosman Powerlet CO2 Cartridges” under heading 2811, HTSUS, in Headquarters Ruling Letter (“HQ”) H320777, dated December 16, 2023, but in so doing did not address the scope of heading 9305, HTSUS.Classification under the HTSUS is determined in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (“GRIs”). GRI 1 provides that the classification of goods shall be determined according to the terms of the headings of the tariff schedule and any relative section or chapter notes. If the goods cannot be classified solely based on GRI 1, and if the headings and legal notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRIs 2 through 6 may then be applied in order. GRI 5 provides, in pertinent part, the following:(b) Subject to the provisions of rule 5(a) above, packing materials and packing containers entered with the goods therein shall be classified with the goods if they are of a kind normally used for packing such goods. However, this provision is not binding when such packing materials or packing containers are clearly suitable for repetitive use.In addition, in interpreting the HTSUS, the Explanatory Notes (“ENs”) of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System may be utilized. The ENs, although not dispositive or legally bi